Not Alzheimer's?
Our services are also for these related disorders.

Alzheimer's Association, New York City Chapter

  • 24-hour helpline: 800.272.3900
  • Translation available in 140 languages
  • Click here to contact us

 

Search
Join Us! On Facebook! On Twitter! On MySpace! On YouTube! On Digg! 
 
Select a Topic
Newsletter Home
Fall 2006 Edition
A Family Caregiver Story
President's Message
From the
Program Director
From the Editor's Desk
Annual Chapter Meeting
Ask Reva
African-American Outreach Update
Safe Return ®
22nd Annual Mayoral Conference
Partnering With Your Doctor
Planting the Seeds of a Culture Change Peer Network in New York
Volunteer Spotlight
Junior Committee Update
Art Exhibition
Reflections -
Ken Howard
Caregivers’ Corner
Point/Counter Point
Public Policy Update
Legal Guidance
Alzheimer’s in the News
N.Y.C.A.R.E.
Caregivers and Depression
N.Y.C.A.R.E.
Clinical Trials
Ways to Give
Development Report
Tributes
Mother's Day &
Father's Day Tributes
Know Your Charity
HonorGift Tribute Cards
ALZNYC Online Store
Bulletin Board
Chapter Staff
Board of Directors
Education Calendar
Support Groups
 

En Español
Archived Versions
Featured Articles Index
 
 
   
   
 
 
Text Size A  A  A

 

In this issue we have asked Dr. Louis Mudannayake and
Dr. Norman Relkin to address the following question...

Should Persons With Dementia Use
Cholinesterase Inhibitors Indefinitely?

A Nursing Home Perspective

How Long Should a Person with Alzheimer’s Disease Be Treated with Available Medicines?

Long term care nursing home residents with dementia have usually reached the advanced stage of the disease. These residents are typically frail elderly and compromised in terms of brain and multiple other organ function. The use of any medication in this population should be individualized and judicious, especially given the sensitivity of this group to adverse drug events and drug to drug interactions. Here at Cobble Hill, medications are scrutinized according to risk and benefit; unnecessary medications and polypharmacy are avoided.

A 6 month duration study published in Lancet (April 07, 2006) suggests acetyl cholinesterase inhibitors can improve cognition and preserve function in patients with severeAlzheimer’s disease. The clinical relevance of acetyl cholinesterase in bringing about a meaningful change in terms of quality of life is however questionable. For example, in a previous study using acetyl cholinesterase on a demented population only a five point improvement in a seventy point neuropsychological scale is observed at best. While even a limited improvement is welcome, it would be prudent not to ignore the bulk of prior studies from July 1966 to April 2006 which indicate only a limited benefit at best in individuals with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s dementia. We might want to consider the small number (fewer than 1%) of post marketing case reports limited to important or life threatening events with patients on acetyl cholinesterase inhibitors as part of the risk to benefit paradigm. I believe we need more studies to validate the results of the Lancet study on individuals with moderate to advanced dementia before we can prescribe these medications on an indefinite basis to this subset of individuals.

With “The Graying of America” or “The Demographic Imperative” and a likely increase in numbers of patients with advanced dementia the question in my mind is who will take care of these patients and how can we maximize care especially in institutionalized settings? In my experience a small change in care provision (e.g. the time of day an individual is taken out of bed or fed or toileted) may have significant impact on function and behavior of that patient with dementia.

Staff training in care delivery and individualizing that delivery using a person-centered approach profoundly improves the quality of life of a given resident with advanced dementia. Social impacts, such as a new nursing assistant or a new room-mate maybe much more important than dopamine or acetyl choline deficiency in determining behavior and function and quality of life of an institutionalized individual with dementia.

To summarize it is my belief that until such time further studies are available on prolonged use (greater than 6 months) of acetyl cholinesterase inhibitors in individuals with advanced dementia, our use of these drugs for that segment of the population should be individualized and cautious. We need to focus on measures of care provision and quality of life that best improve the situation of this frail, elderly vulnerable and often minority subset of our population.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a chronic disorder that requires chronic treatment. There are currently two classes of medications that can be used to slow the decline in memory and other thinking abilities that occurs in AD. Outcome is generally better when medication is started without delay and taken persistently. In my experience, the best results come from starting treatment very early in the course of AD and continuing as long as the person has meaningful abilities to preserve.

There are circumstances in which I believe AD medications should be stopped - for example, if the person’s illness has progressed to such an advanced stage that they have minimal interactions with the world around them. Obviously, any AD medication that causes severe and recurrent side effects should be stopped. In such cases, another approved AD medication should be considered as a substitute. Rarely, a medication intended to slow AD instead produces a more rapid decline than is otherwise expected. If this is confirmed by careful testing, that medication should be discontinued and a substitute sought.

It is sometimes necessary to stop treatment temporarily or decrease the dose of AD medications to address another illness and during certain hospitalizations. However, there can be a withdrawal syndrome when some medications (for example, cholinesterase inhibitors) are stopped for more than just a few days. Withdrawal can result an even more dramatic decline in the space of a few weeks than AD itself causes over several months. Any interruption in treatment should therefore be kept as brief as possible. In general, a physician should be consulted before making any alterations in prescription medications.

Although current treatments are called “symptomatic therapies” recent evidence suggests that they may do more than just provide a “band aid” for AD symptoms.

A number of brain imaging studies have shown that the available treatments can slow the rate of shrinkage of the brain in AD and may help to preserve the health of brain cells that would otherwise have died as a result of the illness. Accordingly, treatment for AD should be started without delay once symptoms become evident and continued without interruption as long as there are meaningful abilities to be preserved.

Dr. Louis Mudannayake, Medical Director, Cobble Hill Health Center, received his Fellowship training in Geriatrics at North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset. His interests other than Geriatrics include Tropical Analog Forestry and Renaissance Tuscany. He lives with his American born family in Park Slope, New York, and Woodstock, Vermont.

Norman Relkin, M.D., Ph.D., Director, The MemoryDisorders Program; New York Presbyterian Hospital — Weill Cornell Medical College

 

Previous | Next

 
 
 
  Donate | About this Site | Security | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Staff Login


Shop For Our Cause Wise Giving Alliance Standard
Seal of Approval