|
Alzheimer’s Caregivers and the
Family Medical Leave Act
T he difficulty of caring for a relative with Alzheimer’s
must be addressed by millions of Americans each year. Taking
time off from work to care for your family member,
although unavoidable, is always a concern as questions of
job performance, promotions, and, simply put, job retention
are always present. For some employees there is protection
under a Federal law, The Family Medical Leave Act
of 1993 (referred to as FMLA). This article will discuss the
act, with a focus on those who must care for an immediate
family member with Alzheimer’s. Note that the act also
covers families seeking leave because of care of newborns,
for parents who are adopting or going to become foster
parents and for the illness of the actual employee.
The FMLA gives employees the right to take up to
12 weeks of unpaid leave per year to care for a sick family
member, without the loss of health insurance benefits and
while maintaining the right to return to the same position
or a comparable position in terms of pay, responsibility and
benefits.
The FMLA applies to companies with 50 or more
employees. Employees must have worked for the company
for at least one year and their job must be within 75
miles of at least 50 other employees. The law applies to
public employers (including local, state and federal offices), educational workers, as well as
private companies.
Under the FMLA, an employee
is entitled to take up to 12 weeks
unpaid leave for each 12 months
that the employee has worked
to care for an immediate family
member with a serious health
condition. The 12 weeks of
leave may be taken all at once or
intermittently, which means that
a covered employee could work a
shorter work week, or perhaps a
shorter work day and use the 12 weeks of time over many
months.
The FMLA defines immediate family member as a
spouse, a child, or a parent.
What qualifies as a serious health condition under
the FMLA? It includes the obvious: any illness, injury,
impairment or physical or mental condition that requires
a person to be hospitalized, be in a hospice, or a nursing
home, as well as post-discharge conditions that require
active medical treatment. Alzheimer’s and related cognitive
impairments do not always fit this limited definition. The
FMLA also defines a serious medical condition as those
suffering from diseases that are chronic and without the
need for ongoing treatment — e.g. Alzheimer’s, a severe
stroke, terminal cancer — and where only supervision by a
health care provider is required.
Maintenance of Medical Benefits
During the FMLA leave, the employer must provide
the same health benefits that it provides to the employee
when not on leave, including family coverage. If there is an
employee contribution, it must to be paid by the employee
during the period of leave. Health benefits can be terminated
only for non-payment of employee contribution or if the
employee informs the company they are not coming back
from the leave.
Job Retention
The act requires the employee to be restored to his or her original job or an equivalent job with equivalent pay,
benefits, and general work rules. The only exception is the
“key man/woman” exception, which permits employers to
refuse to take a person back if it would cause economic injury
to the employer. In order to invoke this exception, the
employer must declare the person to be “key” after the employee
requests a FMLA leave. The designated key employee may then withdraw the request for FMLA leave of absence.
In order for an employer to designate a position “key,” the
salary for that position must be greater then 90% of all
positions in the company within 75 miles of the work site.
Finally, the employee must notify the employer in advance
of the need for FMLA leave and supply proof of the
Medical condition of the individual who needs the care.
Jeffrey G. Abrandt is a partner at Goldfarb Abrandt Salzman & Kutzin LLP. He formerly was Attorney-in-Charge of The Legal Aid Society, Brooklyn
Office for the Aging. He has successfully litigated class actions involving the Medicaid program, expanding the rights of the applicants and recipients and
was co-counsel in Strano v. Perales, which reinstated Medicaid coverage for 24-hour home-care in New York City. Mr. Abrandt, a fellow of the Brookdale
Center of Aging, has served as chair of the Senior Section of the National Legal Aid and Defenders Association.
Previous | Next  |